(2) You are again wrong about the Founders. The works of Thomas Paine were inarguably blasphemous by every 18th century standard. And Titus Andronicus was inarguably obscene - yet was printed at Philadelphia in 1795 even as it was being bowdlerized in its home country.
(3) They shouldn't ban it, because they should value liberty over despotism. They should recognize that all human beings have inalienable rights.
There is also the practical difficulty of allowing governments to devide what can or cannot be said and what does or does not constitute something as amorphous as "blasphemy" and "obscenity."
(4) Why do you strain so hard against the facts to defend the Founders (from something they were right about) when you clearly deplore the Declaration they risked their lives for?
Have fun discussing with your mind.
I bow out and will leave you with your thoughts.
The SCOTUS did issue a ruling that women in high heels stomping on small animals on Youtube is protected “speech”.