[Insigne123]

Sometimes single votes are important, i.e., ObamaCare.

Vote the most conservative and likely candidate.

[jjsheridan5]

Vote the most conservative and likely candidate.

If "most conservative" actually means hostile to conservatism, then no. If "most conservative" means "more damaging to conservatism than a single democrat could ever hope to be", then no. If "most conservative" means that they only vote conservative when their votes don't matter, then no. If "most conservative" means constantly undermining conservative candidates, then no. If "voting most conservative" means doing the same thing that essentially resulted in the end of meaningful opposition to liberalism, then no.

[sand88]

Vote the most conservative and likely candidate.

That is the type of Rovian garbage the elites have been pushing since Reagan.

NO MORE!!!

I think a strong movement should be made whereby Conservatives vote for the RAT against the pretend RATs such as McConnell.

We are about to lose our Republic and you think voting for the most Conservative will save us?

Before we can defeat the evil RATs we need to flush the utterly evil GOPe, even if it means voting RAT (At first we will suffer, but in short order there will be no RINOs left to help the RATs.

Then the people will see a clear distinction between the parties. Of course, it is a long shot -- a collapse will likely happen first.