Skip to comments.
Holder: State Laws That Bar Felons From Voting Are ‘Too Unjust to Tolerate’
CNS News ^
| 02/12/2012
| Susan Jones
Posted on 02/13/2014 10:00:07 AM PST by Responsibility2nd
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
SUMMARY: Since black people commit most of the felonies and are unable to vote then the laws are racist.
Sarcasm ahead: "Gee, I wonder why Holder wants so many criminals to vote?"
To: Responsibility2nd
Holder remaining as AG is too unjust to tolerate.
2
posted on
02/13/2014 10:02:59 AM PST
by
lepton
("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
To: Responsibility2nd
Let criminals vote?
Well, we do allow them to be President and Attorney General of the USA.....
3
posted on
02/13/2014 10:03:07 AM PST
by
Iron Munro
("Show me the man, and I'll show you the crime." - Lavrentiy Beria (& Eric Holder))
To: Responsibility2nd
I wonder if he feels that way about the quarter of a million gun owners that CT just made into felons with its new scary gun registration law.
4
posted on
02/13/2014 10:04:15 AM PST
by
Sirius Lee
(All that is required for evil to advance is for government to do "something")
To: Responsibility2nd
Must give guys like G. Gordon Liddy his second amendment rights back.
5
posted on
02/13/2014 10:04:43 AM PST
by
Vaquero
(Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
To: Responsibility2nd
Holder: State Laws That Bar Felons From Voting Are "Too Unjust to Tolerate, but absentee ballot required postmark trickery to disenfranchise deployed military voters is just fine."
6
posted on
02/13/2014 10:07:04 AM PST
by
Navy Patriot
(Join the Democrats, it's not Fascism when WE do it, and the Constitution and law mean what WE say.)
To: Responsibility2nd
It's so obvious why he's pushing this.
5.8 million new voters, 99% likely democrats.
7
posted on
02/13/2014 10:07:49 AM PST
by
BitWielder1
(Corporate Profits are better than Government Waste)
To: Responsibility2nd
and they are forced to go out and commit more crimes simply because they can’t vote anymore.
8
posted on
02/13/2014 10:09:13 AM PST
by
digger48
To: Responsibility2nd
This turkey has “tolerance” for only laws and people he agrees with.
What a complete travesty it is that he’s the top law enforcement officer in the country.
9
posted on
02/13/2014 10:09:23 AM PST
by
jazusamo
([Obama] A Truly Great Phony -- Thomas Sowell http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3058949/posts)
To: Responsibility2nd
I’m actually okay with that, just as long as the convicted felon can reverse whatever damage he’s done the lead to his felony convicton — brought whoever he’s killed back to life, unraped whoever he’s raped, etc. Otherwise TS. He’s lucky he didn’t end up hanging from a tree.
10
posted on
02/13/2014 10:11:04 AM PST
by
Sooth2222
("Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of congress. But I repeat myself." M.Twain)
To: Responsibility2nd
An AG and a President who flout the laws are too unjust to tolerate...
11
posted on
02/13/2014 10:11:10 AM PST
by
trebb
(Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
To: Navy Patriot
This is why the IRS and Elijiah Cummings are harrassing the people at “True the Vote”
They’ve managed to purge a lot of felons from the states voter rolls that the Democrats relied on for multiple ballots each election
12
posted on
02/13/2014 10:11:32 AM PST
by
digger48
To: Responsibility2nd
simple solution:
if your state is one of the ‘intolerant’ states, when a ‘disenfranchised felon’ is released, make sure to release them into illinois
13
posted on
02/13/2014 10:14:04 AM PST
by
sten
(fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
To: Responsibility2nd
Does Holder think that he should be allowed to vote, even though he is widely known to have committed multiple felonies?
I thought he was too busy helping to rig elections to have much time to vote himself.
14
posted on
02/13/2014 10:15:12 AM PST
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
Hey Holder: Yo mama so fat _____________________ .
15
posted on
02/13/2014 10:19:29 AM PST
by
Enterprise
("Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities." Voltaire)
To: Responsibility2nd
Actually, Holder makes sense from a moral equivalency point of view, in that, if felons can run the country, occupy office in DOJ, State Department, and White House, why shouldn’t they also be able to vote?
16
posted on
02/13/2014 10:19:54 AM PST
by
inpajamas
(http://outskirtspress.com/ONE)
To: Responsibility2nd
Notice that, as usual, it’s not because he gives a crud about felons, per se, but because, according to his own words, it affects “minorities” the most. And minorities, with him, of course means blacks.
17
posted on
02/13/2014 10:20:00 AM PST
by
mrsmel
(One Who Can See)
To: sten
At least there they can become governor.
18
posted on
02/13/2014 10:21:53 AM PST
by
TurboZamboni
(Marx smelled bad and lived with his parents .)
To: Responsibility2nd
If the majority of felons were conservative Republicans, Eric the Holder wouldn’t be whining so much about this. He wouldn’t touch it with a ten foot pole. He’s just working the voter registration rolls for his commie ‘RAT comrades. That’s all this is.
19
posted on
02/13/2014 10:25:37 AM PST
by
FlingWingFlyer
(ObamaCare. The "global warming" of healthcare plans.)
To: mrsmel
ie, if almost all felons were white, Holder wouldn’t be out there asking for this. he’d be saying how great it was all these criminal whites couldn’t vote.
20
posted on
02/13/2014 10:29:52 AM PST
by
Secret Agent Man
(Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson