Latest Obamacare Rewrite: Readers Point Out the Obvious Which Sarah Kliff Avoids

NewsBusters ^ | February 11, 2014 | P.J. Gladnick

[PJ-Comix]

As we have seen, the television networks have avoided the controversy of President Obama unilaterally delaying  another Obamacare provision in the law yet again. Even more absurd is when a newspaper writer whose main task is to cover healthcare also neglects to mention that same elephant in the room. Such was the case with Sarah Kliff of the Washington Post who breezily reported on the details of the latest delay in the employer mandate but does not address the obvious presidential overreach of ignoring the provisions of the statute.

It was left to the readers of the Kliff article to go where Sarah dare not tread. It was another case in which the comments section was way more informative than the article itself. Here is Kliff defining "rewriting" as "relaxing":

[PJ-Comix]

[EQAndyBuzz]

Haha...classic.

[Doc Savage]

Kneepads!

[cicero2k]

How come the Republicans are not challenging the President on over reach of authority, or some legal foundation filing actions in the Supreme Court?

Is there no there there?

[Tilted Irish Kilt]

cicero2k :" How come the Republicans are not challenging the President on over reach of authority,
or some legal foundation filing actions in the Supreme Court?"

Presdiential Executive ignorance of the legal ACA law;
This is number #16 change.
How long does this continue before someone , somewhere says that ignorance of the law is illegal ?
ENOUGH ALREADY !!

[GOPJ]

As we have seen, the television networks have avoided the controversy of President Obama unilaterally delaying another Obamacare provision in the law yet again. Even more absurd is when a newspaper writer whose main task is to cover healthcare also neglects to mention that same elephant in the room.

The real reason newspapers are dying... the real reason few watch network news... Happens when 'journalists' whore for one party...