Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Blood of Tyrants
"Which is why we need a Con Con."

Yeah! I'd love to have our Right to Keep and Bear Arms up for review and approval by today's Congress! I'm sure we can all trust the Leftist 'Rats and the gutless Pubbies to do the right thing and reaffirm our rights, right? /sarc

A Con Con would be the worst thing that could happen. Do you really want the likes of Schumer, Reid and Swinesein deciding which of your rights you can keep, and which taxpayer funded giveaway programs are going to be declared "rights"? Even doing nothing would be better than a Con Con.

Scouts Out! Cavalry Ho!

35 posted on 02/10/2014 6:15:36 PM PST by wku man (We are the 53%! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YUXN0GDuLN4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: wku man

There is no constitutional mechanism for a new constitutional convention or “con con” However, article V provides for an amendments process that bypasses he federal government via the states. This is an amendatory convention; not a “con-con”.


75 posted on 02/10/2014 8:08:29 PM PST by grumpygresh (Democrats delenda est. New US economy: Fascism on top, Socialism on the bottom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson