Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: HammerT
HammerT said: "I’m running into more and more people who have that same attitude ..."

I thought through the situation some years ago and concluded that the only choice I had was to withdraw my consent to be governed. The Bill of Rights, including the Second Amendment, were being deliberately and systematically ignored.

I saw somebody else claim that recently and he received much the same response I did; that is, it doesn't matter whether you consent or not.

But I disagree. My withdrawal of consent has the same moral force as that of our Founders when they wrote the Declaration of Independence. If I obey the law today it is not because I value the benefit to others. It is solely because it benefits me. I think that distinction is very important.

Will I ever consent to be governed again in the future? Perhaps. The Heller decision is a step in the right direction. The foot-dragging in the lower courts has, however, continued. We'll see.

47 posted on 02/10/2014 3:02:36 PM PST by William Tell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]


To: William Tell

Withdrawing my consent to be governed – I like that.

I’ll put this in starker terms – if they don’t have to follow the rule of law, than neither do we.


55 posted on 02/11/2014 7:28:22 AM PST by HammerT (The COMMONSENSE CIVIL RIGHT OF ARMED SELF-DEFENSE [CASD], itÂ’s the law of the land.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson