So you’re not on board with the homo agenda but children are born “gay” and can be whatever “gender” suits them, and homo marriage is a done deal and we can’t turn back the clock [to the dark ages apparently].
1. Not on board with homo agenda.
2. A very small child should be allowed to play with the toys he or she wants to. I don’t know why children choose different play things or enjoy dressing up as whomever. No one knows whether it means something later or not. Kids are not gay or straight, they are just kids. I support them as they are.
3. Please tell me how to make gay marriage at this point illegal throughout the USA and how to make it, instead of a “change whose time has come” in most Americans’ minds, absolutely unthinkable as a phenomenon as it was in, say, 1960.
2. A very small child should be allowed to play with the toys he or she wants to.
That’s not the way you’ve presented this view of yours in the past. Your view is that some children, although in a female or male body, are actually the opposite “gender” inside. That is entirely different than a boy who likes sewing and a girl who likes baseball, as we have discussed many times. You are on board with the homo agenda:
1. Kids are born gay or the “transgender” and that’s all there is to it, they cannot “change”.
2. Homo marriage here - “We here, we’re queer, get used to it” some fits in with that attitude. You critcize poeple who are opposed to the destruction of moral absolutes and accepting of “gay marriage”.
Your argument that people think differently about perversion now than in 1960 is specious in the extreme. VEry few states have had the populace vote for it, for one thing. And due to the loudness of the 2$ who are actually homosexuals, and their rabid leftist supporters, no one is allowed to tell the truth about the “gay” life or the homo agenda in school, in the military, in newspapesr, in the professions, etc.
Let people hear the truth and the winds will change radically.