To: SoConPubbie; Alberta's Child
Well, so I see your ability to think a topic through and see relevant patterns are totally shot, or is it you've started early on the week-end libations?
Or is it that you are one of the wacky Libertarians like Ron Paul who thinks we didn't need to fight either the Civil War or WWII?
27 posted on
02/07/2014 6:00:48 PM PST by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
To: SoConPubbie; Alberta's Child
Well, so I see your ability to think a topic through and see relevant patterns are totally shot, or is it you've started early on the week-end libations?
Or is it that you are one of the wacky Libertarians like Ron Paul who thinks we didn't need to fight either the Civil War or WWII?
Of course we needed to fight them - we need to follow the orders of financial elites.
When they schedule a war, everybody has to participate.
On a not completely unrelated note, the new world order reading assignment of the day:
W. Averell Harriman
34 posted on
02/07/2014 6:27:00 PM PST by
PieterCasparzen
(We have to fix things ourselves)
To: SoConPubbie
"Or is it that you are one of the wacky Libertarians like Ron Paul who thinks we didn't need to fight either the Civil War or WWII?"
WWI, no. We needed to do that one. War of Northern Aggression, though, yes.
Or are you one of those wacky statists who think Lincoln was a hero?
Hank
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson