To: cotton1706
Saving it for the lame duck session?
2 posted on
02/06/2014 9:25:09 AM PST by
fwdude
( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
To: fwdude
That is what I have told by insiders on the Hill.
6 posted on
02/06/2014 9:28:24 AM PST by
kabar
To: fwdude
“Saving it for the lame duck session?”
That’s their last card trick. The problem with that is that they wouldn’t be able to get lots of people on the voting rolls before the election to stem a conservative tide, which is their whole point in pushing it.
But I wouldn’t put it past, say a defeated McConnell and a retiring Boehner to try to push it through before a new Congress is seated. For then they will have to start all over again.
To: fwdude
Saving it for the lame duck session?
From 2 days ago Texas Sen. John Cornyn, saying he was very skeptical that anythings going to happen between now and November.
Now and NOVEMBER? What about DECEMBER and the Lame Duck Session, Cornyn??
19 posted on
02/06/2014 9:45:26 AM PST by
jimbo123
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson