[wideawake]

the common sentiment here is that everyone has the moral obligation to flout unjust or stupid laws

For example, in this case, the "unjust or stupid" law against theft?

You realize that every individual, left to his own recognizance, can arbitrarily decide that any law at all is "unjust or stupid", right?

That your premise implies utter anarchy?

[elkfersupper]

That your premise implies utter anarchy?

The definition of "anarchy" is "without a ruler".

Suits me.

[elkfersupper]

That your premise implies utter anarchy?

Anarchy is defined as "being without a ruler".

Nothing wrong with that.