[Dr. Sivana]

sounds like vandalism of public property

If the overpass is over an Interstate it could be a driving distraction.

No defacing of public property involved. If the display is deemed to be a driving distraction, why did the police get involved when anti-Walker and other lefty demonstrations on the same overpass were left alone?

If the only significant difference is the content of the message, this is a clear violation of the First Amendment.

[Mears]

“No defacing of public property involved. If the display is deemed to be a driving distraction, why did the police get involved when anti-Walker and other lefty demonstrations on the same overpass were left alone?
“

—

I certainly was not aware of that.Appears to be selective law enforcement.

.