Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Rockpile

No kidding, but BAe Systems has more workshare in the F35B variant of the JSF, and as Britain’s biggest defence (and only super-sized) contractor, they have a lot of clout over HM Government defence procurement policy. This is why they steered the ship towards operating the F35B instead of the F35C, or even worse, a foreign aircraft like the Dassault Rafale or SAAB Gripen in which they had no workshare at all.

If I had my way we’d have got two amphibious assault ships capable of operating the F35Bs to complement carriers built to proper specs, but especially in an age of austerity and declining budgets, that was never going to happen...


10 posted on 02/06/2014 8:42:46 AM PST by sinsofsolarempirefan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: sinsofsolarempirefan

They just cannot carry as much fuel and payload as when flung from yhe cats. Sigh of exasperation.

As a Texan residing hundreds of miles from the ocean it bugs the hell out of me that Britain maintains a shadow of a Navy compared to what there should be. They don’t need a massive 1945 force but we still do not live in a world of butterflys and daffodils.


11 posted on 02/06/2014 10:12:43 AM PST by Rockpile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson