[fwdude]

Expect Democrats to magnify their own self-created problems in this first big election with our reasonable law in place. Expect the incessant crying and whining to be deafening.

[Cicero]

Maybe the Dems in places like Houston can just start issuing drivers licenses to dead people. I’m sure they’ll figure something out.

[cripplecreek]

Bring out your dead.

[SMGFan]

But isn’t a comparison of signatures by the poll worker enough? It is here in New Jersey? :)

[a fool in paradise]

Last election, Abortion Barbie claims she was being deliberately disenfranchised by the voter ID laws.

More DNC talking points.

Wendy Davis’ fix to voting law lets her cast ballot
10/30/13 12:15 PM—Updated 11/01/13 02:55 PM
http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/wendy-davis-outsmarts-texas-voter-id-law

But when the state senator got to her polling place, poll workers noted that the name on her driver’s license, Wendy Russell Davis, didn’t match that on her voter rolls, Wendy Davis. That meant that under the law, she was required to sign an affidavit swearing that she was who she said she was.

“It was a simple procedure,” Davis told reporters afterward. “I signed the affidavit and was able to vote with no problem.”

[smoothsailing]

[Amendment10]

The states have never amended the Constitution to expressly protect the so-called right to vote without having to show a valid photo ID. And since Texas is now requiring a state-issued photo ID in order to vote, the next is to reduce campaign fraud imo.

Since the states have likewise never amended the Constitution to expressly protect voters from having to demonstrate a basic knowledge of the Constitution in order to vote, the states should require candidate voters to pass a basic constitutional law test, written or oral, in order to do so. Such a test would emphasize the federal government's constitutional Article I, Section 8-limited powers, and also Congress's limited power to lay taxes.

“Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States.” —Justice John Marshall, Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.

The main purpose of such a test would be to make voters more aware of constitutionally indefensible campaign promises made by candidates for federal office.

[a fool in paradise]

Make ballot stuffing a capital offense.

[MasterGunner01]

So, you have a precinct with 1,000 registered voters. Some 2,000 votes are cast on election day. Vote fraud is charged, but the Board of Elections and court cannot say definitively that there's any indication of fraud. And so, the election is certified and the Donkey wins. How unexpected...NOT. [The average person would say there's something wrong, just based on the numbers alone, but not the Board of elections or the courts. Hmmmm.]