“litmus matrix”
Wouldn’t that rid FR of extremist-conservatives, i.e., those who would want mass-killings of dims/liberals/left-wingers/progressives/socialists/communists/totalitarians/RINOs, etc.? In my mind they are all synonyms but.....
The locals, the FBI, NSA, Obemba’s civilian national police force or whatever he calls it, probably the CIA and who knows which other countries and/or terrorist organizations already have their sights on FR. With your suggestion ‘they’ could simply weed-out those who pose no threat to their agenda and focus on what they would consider to be the ‘hard-liners’. Let them ‘drill down’ and browse through the posts to find whatever it is that they want to find.
Does FR want to open the book for those who are already watching, reading and ‘listening’? I do not think that FR wants to do that. I and I am sure, many others do not want FR to do that, including JimRob. Maybe that was on his mind when he dismissed your idea.
( One newbie to another “Newbie” ), ;-) “Newbie” or not, your suggestion is a good one but on the surface only and only on one edge of the sword. There are always two edges to a sword. I do not like the other edge. No offense meant.
“litmus matrix” Wouldn’t that rid FR of
***It would not rid FR of anyone. It would be a voluntary matrix to fill out. But if someone pushes Abortion On Demand and claims on their litmus matrix to be prolife, then they are simply lying and it would be up to the mods to deal with them. What I have seen are openly anti-conservative trolls operating for more than a decade on FR.
With your suggestion ‘they’ could simply weed-out those who pose no threat to their agenda and focus on what they would consider to be the ‘hard-liners’.
***You simply do not understand the proposal. Perhaps you’ve never drilled down on a 700 post thread (or 3300 post thread, for that matter) only to find that the FReeper you are debating against is an obvious anti-conservative CINO, RINO, or some other troll.
With your suggestion ‘they’ could simply weed-out those who pose no threat to their agenda and focus on what they would consider to be the ‘hard-liners’.
***That makes NO sense at ALL.
Let them ‘drill down’ and browse through the posts to find whatever it is that they want to find.
*** You obviously have not encountered the gang-trolls nor the long term anti-conservative trolls. Here’s a place to START. Read all the posts like I did.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1821435/posts
Does FR want to open the book for those who are already watching, reading and ‘listening’?
***Ooooh, a boogieman argument. Look how scared us real conservatives are.
I do not think that FR wants to do that.
***You have no idea who is lined up against true conservatives, or perhaps you are even one of them.
I and I am sure, many others do not want FR to do that, including JimRob. Maybe that was on his mind when he dismissed your idea.
***He didn’t seem to dismiss the idea when he opened up the bugzapper thread and told a long term CINO FReeper to “get lost, asswipe”.
( One newbie to another “Newbie” ), ;-) “Newbie” or not, your suggestion is a good one but on the surface only and only on one edge of the sword. There are always two edges to a sword.
***This is a single edged sword. Period. The other edge is blunt. Or have you not been following FR of late? JimRob endorsed someone he claimed he would NEVEr endorse, -someone he called a lying, babykilling, gun-grabbing, homosexual agenda loving statist.
I do not like the other edge.
***I daresay you do not like the single edge because it would expose you.
No offense meant.