“The original post and subsequent comments on this thread by “Carlo3b” appear to me to be inconsistent with his writing style with which I’m quite familiar.”
I am going to concur. Look at this one sentence.
from carlo3b
“In balancing, deliberating, and reasoning, there was but one undeniable truth, if it was the genius of our reproductive system, and the female of our species was chosen by design, biologically...”
Frankly, this is intellectual clap trap, blah blah blah, blah blah blah.
Intelectual clap trap is not Carlo3b’s strong suit. And I know intellectual clap trap when I see it because I occassionally engage in it.
I am on Carlo3b’s ping list and I have read alot of his posts and have learned almost nothing from hundred’s of them.
Why do I read them ? It is because Carlo has this refreshing naivate that puts a smile on my face. I find them to be plain, not very intellectual, but very addicting nonetheless.
Yes, something is rotten in Denmark. Carlo3b did not write this.
See Post 180.
"Why do I read them ? It is because Carlo has this refreshing naivate that puts a smile on my face. I find them to be plain, not very intellectual, but very addicting nonetheless."
In my experience, having an inflated opinion of one's own intellect, especially compared to that of others, goes hand in hand with "enlightened", moderate views on abortion, homosexuality, etc.
(Huge sarc tag on "enlightened).