I think that Ted Cruz would make a terrific President, and if he ran (which I don’t think he will so soon) I’d probably support him, given that we don’t seem to be getting very good candidates to consider a run. And no, your boy Rand Paul is not a good presidential candidate (but I do hope that he runs so that he has to give up his Senate seat, which also is up in 2016).
I am not “concerned” about Matt Bevin: I think that he’s a Paultard and a joke of a candidate for the U.S. Senate, and the only way that I would support him is if he somehow won the GOP nomination (since I would take even a Paultard over Grimey (as she prefers to be called)). With the candidates currently running for the GOP nomination, I have to hold my nose and support Mitch McConnell for his 94th term or whatever it is now. Good job there, Kentuckians, in not getting a half-decent conservative to run against McConnell, and then putting all your eggs in a Paulistinian basket.
“...your boy Rand Paul is not a good presidential candidate (but I do hope that he runs so that he has to give up his Senate seat, which also is up in 2016)....With the candidates currently running for the GOP nomination, I have to hold my nose and support Mitch McConnell...”
*****************************************************************
Two things—First you’ve NEVER seen me posting a comment supporting Rand Paul for President because that’s something I would not do. And second, thanks for clarifying that the reason you’re taking shots at Bevin is because you (holding nose or not) support the GOPe candidate in yet another race.
Just a question...
What has Bevin done for you to call him a paultard or paulistinian?