Well, ‘you get what you pay for’ - I knew going into this not to expect much. I’ve learned more pro and con for each side right here on FR.
I never have visited the Creation Museum either simply b/c Ham ignores the most plausible theory imho of all origins theories - namely the hydroplate theory - the one I keep posting and excerpting from by Dr. Walt Brown.
It is a very good read with plenty of scientific facts and quotes [mostly from the leading evolution ‘experts’] as well as Dr. Brown’s own scientific findings, 50 some predictions, and more cross-references than I’ve seen in any other book. Part III is a Q&A on the most commonly asked questions. Outside of the Bible it is the one book that completely won me over to the straightforward plain and simple reading of Genesis.
If you want to see the best arguments against evolution and for biblical creation then read this free online book.
http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/LifeSciences5.html
It is much better than flinging poo like so many monkees do...
I already debunked that book you kept referencing twice. Its misses any arguments for the Creation, as did Creationist Ham last night,
The weight of DNA cited as proof of creation doesn't’ point the meter one way or the other.
Ham showed what is demanded of other Christians by his Creationists : Io deny the laws of observable physics and other scientific laws.
I thought Nye's rhetoric about Creationists hurting kids was hyperbole, but Creationist Ham proved its a real danger.