I have read a number of Creationist Science books.
That link under evidence of Creation cites the standard Creationist argument that its improbable that the building blocks of life came together by pure random accident.
That argument is exactly how I stated it, that it doesn’t support the non-existent Creationist theory, it just straw mans an origin of life theory, which is meant to discredit evolution.
But there is no alternative provided.
So there is nothing to debate.
Its like saying we need to get rid of Obamacare while claiming an alternative is that no-one ever gets sick.
Sorry I could not agree less with your analogy.
Mathematicians [not christians] are the single highest group percentage that reject the theory of evolution b/c the odds of random chance producing life are staggering - so small it’s not worthy of being called a theory.
Plus it is the evolution crowd which abandoned abiogenesis - so there is no foundation just this gigantic assumption of a single cell starting point. There is not only stasis in the fossil record but zero evo explanation for polystrate fossils too. I could go on and on but their is no point b/c your crowd simply ignores all their major problems or declares them off limits while slinging crap at creation.
Even information theory strikes a blow against random chance b/c you could not be having this conversations over several different communication layers w/o their being an ultimate creator at each and every level. The inter-connnectedness of life also tells the tale of the need for an intelligence far above anything man could ever accomplish.
It’s God you’ll have to answer to someday not me. The evidence against evolution is simply staggering. Pastor John MacArthur summed it up best ‘You simply love your sin more than you love your God.’
See? What did I tell you? All sorts of evolutionists were EAGER to debate those men who, though educated in the sciences, were convinced of the evidence of a Creator...there are records of all sorts of debates...but NOW, the evolution side is NOT interested in debate...and it ISN'T because their side "won" when the two ideas were put side by side.
I submit it is because they weren't able to defend their conclusions in an adequate fashion.
Think about it; if the evolutionists were mopping the floor with every "creationist", they'd be HAPPY to go prove them wrong over and over....but, uh, they CANNOT do that. So they just say "Shut up."