Links of interest...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bardi_family
Quote from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_College_London ...
“UCL was founded on 11 February 1826 under the name London University as a secular alternative to the religious universities of Oxford and Cambridge.[17][18] Despite having had no direct role in its foundation, the philosopher Jeremy Bentham is commonly regarded as the father of UCL; his radical ideas on education and society were the inspiration to the institution’s founders, particularly the Scotsmen James Mill (1773–1836) and Henry Brougham (1778–1868).[19] London University’s first Warden was Leonard Horner, who was the first scientist to head a British university.[20]”
UCL was bounded by key people involved with the British East India Company, as noted in the above quote. Bentham was the agent of Lord Shelburne, leader of the EIC political faction.
A century later, in the same neighborhood, mostly between WWI and WWII, Bloomsbury...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bloomsbury_Group
Note the wide-ranging societal influence of the group, the chief patron of which was the would-be aristocratic whore...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lady_Ottoline_Morrell
One of the members of this Bloomsbury Group was...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Maynard_Keynes
His father...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Neville_Keynes
was educated at University College London.
In 1806 the East India Company founded...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/East_India_Company_College
One of the professors was...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Robert_Malthus
Who was friends with both Jeremy Bentham and...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Ricardo
whose father was a successful trader on the London Stock Exchange.
Basically all of the famous “free trade” writers promoting “capitalism” from the 18th century onwards were all promoting the agendas that greatly aided international bankers / traders, i.e., the business and in many cases biological heirs to early banking families like the Bardi family. Today, accepted thought on modern economics is all rooted in their writings, they simply have two sides: those who advocate for “central” banks creating money based on issuance of government debt, or money being created with the necessity of “backing” it with gold. Both schemes bring government hat in hand to international banking to either borrow or acquire gold. It’s called setting up and controlling both sides of an argument. While everyone is arguing one side or the other, international banking profits under either of the solutions they designed.
Do you mean to tell us sometimes conspiracies really do exist?