Yeah, The Catholic vote went for Obama both times, that is to be expected since the Catholic vote has only gone republican 5 times in history.
When the tens of millions of Catholics from the most Catholic nations on earth started flooding America after JFK’s immigration dream was realized, they kept up the tradition of democrat voting that the Catholic denomination’s members have always done, that won’t ever change.
Liberal Catholics from Catholic nations overwhelming America and joining the institutionalized Catholic liberalism in America, we all know what that means for out future, it has already moved America radically left, and this is only the beginning, the left counts on them to take Texas soon, like they did California.
Your ever larger and longer posts don’t change the facts that we all know.
If you plan to turn all of them into Evangelical Christians, that isn’t going to happen, at least not in time to save America.
50% to 48% is not a big difference, certainly not compared to the Latino, Asian, or black vote.
When the tens of millions of Catholics from the most Catholic nations on earth started flooding America after JFK’s immigration dream was realized, they kept up the tradition of democrat voting that the Catholic denomination’s members have always done, that won’t ever change.?
In 2012 the Catholic vote was a wash. The Jewish vote is far more heavily Democrat along with the Muslim vote. And atheists voted 70% to 26% for Obama. They constituted 12% of the electorate--more than the Hispanic vote.
Liberal Catholics from Catholic nations overwhelming America and joining the institutionalized Catholic liberalism in America, we all know what that means for out future, it has already moved America radically left, and this is only the beginning, the left counts on them to take Texas soon, like they did California.
You must really detest Catholics. Be that as it may, the most dominant variable is race and ethnicity, not religion when it comes to predicting voting behavior. CA became a solid blue state because of immigration.
The fundamental problem for Republicans in California is that immigration has created a new electorate. Massive legal immigration has changed California from a state with an electorate comprised mostly of U.S.-born whites, blacks, and well-established Hispanics to an electorate heavily comprised of Asian and Hispanic immigrants and their children who agree with the progressive agenda of state’s Democrats. As Gimpel observes, “past Republican votes in Congress in favor of a more generous immigration policy have unquestionably bolstered local Democratic majorities.” There is no question this is what happened in California.
Your ever larger and longer posts don’t change the facts that we all know.
The problem is that you don't know the facts. You are riddled with hatred and would rather ascribe the changing electorate to a religion rather than immigration and tribal politics. You don't need no stinkin' facts.