Sure. Other than winning games, he had no ability at all, and all 64+ quarterbacks in the NFL are better than him. Yep, that’s easy to see. Anyone could have stepped in at Denver on a bad losing streak, turned it around, and even won the first playoff game. Yep, dime a dozen talent right there.
And as I said, CNN is only interested in improving their bottom line.
On a separate note, tell me why the NFL vetoed the Daniel Defense commercial. Does their money not spend as well?
Yeah the other 44 players on the team had nothing to do with it. And apparently the teams have decided that the QB they've got is better than the QB that's failed.
On a separate note, tell me why the NFL vetoed the Daniel Defense commercial. Does their money not spend as well?
You would have to ask the NFL that.