Skip to comments.
Report: US Abortion Rate Lowest Since 1973
AP via Yahoo ^
| February 2, 2014
| David Carey
Posted on 02/02/2014 2:23:05 PM PST by srmorton
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
Good news on Super Bowl Sunday! Thanks to 3-D and 4-D sonograms, it's getting harder to convince women that their babies are "unviable" masses of tissue.
1
posted on
02/02/2014 2:23:06 PM PST
by
srmorton
To: srmorton
I think more and more people are finally starting to figure out that when you kill a baby, it’s murder, not a “choice”. No where in the Constitution does it say that a woman can choose to kill her baby if she so desires. No where.
2
posted on
02/02/2014 2:36:02 PM PST
by
FlingWingFlyer
(ObamaCare. The "global warming" of healthcare plans.)
To: srmorton
Over one million abortions...
Makes one proud doesn’t it...
Very few people when asked if they think over one million abortions per year is acceptable, answer in the affirmative.
3
posted on
02/02/2014 2:36:03 PM PST
by
DoughtyOne
(Amnesty is job NONE! It isn't even the leading issue with Hipanics.)
To: srmorton
Guttmacher is owned by Planned Parenthood.
So you know the numbers are accurate./s
And NY and CA don’t report their numbers for a number of years now.
SO we are north of 60 million dead children, all unique individuals, since 1973.
All because of a lawless Supreme Court creating law which they had no right to do, but no one stopped them.
Judgement could come at any time. God’s patience and mercy is not inexhaustible.
Ask the Jews in 722 BC and 606-586 BC.
4
posted on
02/02/2014 2:40:27 PM PST
by
exit82
("The Taliban is on the inside of the building" E. Nordstrom 10-10-12)
To: srmorton
That’s because, since about ‘08, fertility levels have completely crashed in this country.
Fewer women are getting pregnant. Therefore fewer of them are needing abortions.
To: srmorton; NYer; Salvation
Can guttmacher institute #s be trusted since they are a power behind PPA?
6
posted on
02/02/2014 2:51:51 PM PST
by
GreyFriar
(Spearhead - 3rd Armored Division 75-78 & 83-87)
Comment #7 Removed by Moderator
To: srmorton
While the overall abortion rate declined, the proportion of abortions entailing early medication procedures continued to increase.
It's not clear to me what this sentence means but i hope that there truly is a reduction in abortions and not just a shift from surgical abortions to chemical abortions.
To: srmorton
To: MuttTheHoople
Isn’t this one of their bread and butter issues? Those evil pro-life fanatics must be getting through to the people.
10
posted on
02/02/2014 3:15:56 PM PST
by
dowcaet
To: Black Agnes
I would add fewer “Caucasian, US citizen” to your spot on post.
The illegals and gibmedats are breeding like rabbits.
11
posted on
02/02/2014 3:21:06 PM PST
by
GOPsterinMA
(You're a very weird person, Yossarian.)
To: All
12
posted on
02/02/2014 3:23:00 PM PST
by
musicman
(Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
To: GOPsterinMA
To: exit82
You are correct, but I have heard Rush comment many times that the number of abortions have been steadily declining in the US because the hearts of people are being changed by the TRUTH about this horrible practice. Not only the sonograms, but the accounts of babies who survived birth at 23-25 weeks and the trial of abortion doctor Kermit Gosnell have penetrated the consciousness of those who thought they were pro-choice. Young people in particular have been becoming more pro-life as a group.
14
posted on
02/02/2014 3:43:05 PM PST
by
srmorton
(Deut. 30 19: "..I have set before you life and death,....therefore, choose life..")
To: GreyFriar
Yeah, Guttmacher is aligned with the gut-smashers, BUT they do have the most recent and most accurate statistics. All abortion researchers on both sides use their numbers, though not necessarily their analysis.
They're highly motivated to get actionable intel. They're into marketing, after all.
15
posted on
02/02/2014 3:49:04 PM PST
by
Mrs. Don-o
("St Michael the Archangel, defend us in battle. . . against the wickedness and snares of the devil.")
To: exit82
Judgement could come at any time. Gods patience and mercy is not inexhaustible.The first sentence is true. The second?
Another question I would ask, if we are getting back to the right path of fewer abortions, and judgment comes, should we blame the past, or the fact that we are not aborting as many babies as we used to?
16
posted on
02/02/2014 3:52:00 PM PST
by
Balding_Eagle
(Over production, one of the top 5 worries for the American Farmer every year.)
To: Black Agnes
That’s truly a shocker! I see fewer and fewer pregnant Caucasians and more and more “others” ready to pop with others in tow.
Hmmm...
17
posted on
02/02/2014 3:52:14 PM PST
by
GOPsterinMA
(You're a very weird person, Yossarian.)
To: srmorton
Three words: Morning After Pill.
18
posted on
02/02/2014 3:54:43 PM PST
by
SkyPilot
To: FlingWingFlyer
How people in the 1880s viewed an abortionist.
19
posted on
02/02/2014 3:57:25 PM PST
by
Ruy Dias de Bivar
(Sometimes you need 7+ more ammo. LOTS MORE.)
To: FlingWingFlyer
With the POTUS constantly harping on it and the rabid female libs, it really starts making people think about what it really is. Their evilness has backfired on them.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson