Posted on 01/31/2014 3:25:41 PM PST by SoConPubbie
On Tuesday, Obama again called on Congress to get immigration reform done this year, right before the House GOP leadership is set to release its "immigration principles," which are expected to push for "legal status" for millions of illegal immigrants.
"While claiming to be concerned with job creation for American workers, our government is trying to ram through amnesty, which will result in a flood of foreign workers competing with Americans for the few jobs there are," Palin wrote in a Facebook response on Wednesday morning.
Palin also quoted Ronald Reagan's famous maxim that the nine most frightening words in the English language are, "Im from the government and Im here to help." She mocked all of the "help" that "a bloated bankrupt federal government has given us":
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
You bet. How did you ever guess?
Woo-Hoo! You’re home safe!!!
Yes, please always give me a couple of minutes to PING!
I’m MUCH OLDER and MUCH SLOWER, than YOUNG CUTIE PIE YOU!
You don't see the big picture, do you.
What does censuring McCain by a state Republican party accomplishes? Absolutely nothing. It simply feeds the narrative that Republicans are in-fighting, Republicans are too extreme, when Obama's agenda continue to wreak havoc on America.
I have no problems with Sarah being loyal to McCain. Being chosen to run for Vice-President, considering the person chosen was a mere housewife 1.5 decades ago prior to 2008, is a huge honor, and no amount of RINOism can take that away from somebody.
Where does Palin agree with Mccain on the issues? She did not support interventionism in Syria when McCain was gung-ho for it. She does not support amnesty, QE, and other aspects of Obama's agenda that most Washington Republicans support.
Also, the loyal support of McCain is simply a reflection of Palin's devout Christian beliefs, which you obviously don't understand.
I swerved off the “I LOVE SARAH!” path, and I have damned good reasons. And tell the little ones I am not, nor ever will be, a Mod. I’d be terrible at it. That is all.
It also shows the inner workings of a mind to sexualize those with whom he disagrees politically, but labeling someone that is of loose sexual morals.
It makes one wonder why the choice for derogatory words is sexualized. Methinks he is a misogynist.
Maybe he has been jilted and it transferring his anger through politics. That is typically a liberal thing to do, IMHO.
YOU asked ME.
Makes me glad you aren't one because you would be terrible at it.
YOU honor Free Republic by being here Onyx!
Some of the best our side has right now are Women.
As shown by the Idiot MSNBC thing saying none of us like Bi-Racial Families.
Well the Crusty Old Big Government people maybe old white men, but us Conservatives are Young(er), More Female, Black, Asian, Jewish et al than ever before and we are growing!
Oh! I get it! You are Onyx. I get it. Mum's the word. Bye.
{Wink!}
LOLOL.
Thanks for THAT clarification.
Can't defend your calling Sarah a Tramp eh? Gotta run before you make an even bigger fool of yourself.
I WISH I was Onyx.
I could never be as good as person as her.
She would never call you a Misogynist Putz like I would.
Cheers!
I’m thrilled he got censured!
Why do you even care what word I use?
*************
Well, Cyber Liberty, I care because tramp is a very strong word to use against someone who’s doing more for the conservative cause than just about anyone - and who certainly is NOT, nor deserves to be called, that name.
Sarah has taken heat, for the last four years, undeservedly and (almost) exclusively, from the left.
We can all agree to disagree about Sarah supporting Juan McCain. I’ve posted that I’d prefer she not even give him the time of day. Your calling her a tramp does NOTHING but put you in the exact same low-life category as the left. AND, to top it off, you’re **speculating** that she gave support to McCain because of her Dad.
You can claim *having to watch every angle* all you want. Sinking to the level of calling Sarah a tramp is beyond the pale, and doesn’t for a minute minimize your tactics. How about you at least apologize for that?
Then ask Jim to throw me off. Oh Wait! You did!
Leave it. I’m not happy with Sarah Palin right now. Does that mean I’m crosswise with a cult of personality? Then OK, I would go willingly.
Fact is, that’s not what it’s about. This may shock you, but I think I’m deeper than that.
Don’t forget that Gov. Sarah Palin’s husband, children, grandchild and in-laws are all Native Americans.
I never asked Jim to throw you off. I asked you to apologize for calling Sarah Palin a tramp. Let’s see if you’re “deep enough” to do that.
No one is going to defeat the Evil Usurper in the White House if we are all divided.
We MUST overlook semantics and things said in the heat of the moment and concentrate on the common goal: UNITING AMERICA!
Oh, Jane. I am being swarmed upon for a word that I think was the right word for me at the time. I am not posting on the thread anymore, OK? I offered that to someone I always called a friend earlier, and I’m confirming it now. Bye. Everybody.
Before I lose more friends over a GD politician.
Stop. Please. One of you has to be the adult. Who is it going to be?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.