Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: XRdsRev
” The screeners test was very difficult and you had to be pretty sharp to pass it.”

I don't know what your friends were like but I found the test not that hard. It was basic common sense, but then I was educated when a education actually meant something.

One of the traits that did show up to a surprising degree among co-workers was back stabbing and using sexual and affirmative action complaints to further advancement.

You not only had to watch for "security threats" but had to be extremely careful in word or deed lest you run afoul of the "chronically offended." The management was no better and displayed some amazing gross incompetence. I eventually resigned in disgust.

17 posted on 01/31/2014 2:41:10 PM PST by Polynikes (What would Walt Kowalski do. In the meantime "GET OFF MY LAWN")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: Polynikes

“I don’t know what your friends were like but I found the test not that hard. It was basic common sense, but then I was educated when a education actually meant something.’

I don’t know when you were tested but the original threat identification screening exercises were quite difficult according to many sources. Common sense had nothing to do with those tests, they relied on visual acuity and quick threat assessment.

Based on the caliber of agent I have seen, I can’t imagine they still perform the same battery of tests for qualification.


20 posted on 01/31/2014 6:20:40 PM PST by XRdsRev (New Jersey - Crossroads of the American Revolution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson