Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sukhoi-30mki

One complaint that is really a pet peeve. Why can’t the Navy have a consistent naming policy for their vessels anymore? Subs have gone from fish names to cities to states, with politicians thrown in for the sake of ego. Surface ships are even worse. Ships in the same class can be named after people, places, and things, and name categories are spread over many different ships of completely different classes and missions. The system they had in place has been largely abandoned, so now you don’t know what a vessel is based on the name. And why do politicians like Stennis and Vinson rate carriers, while carrier admirals like Halsey and Spruance get destroyers?


3 posted on 01/29/2014 8:22:46 PM PST by yawningotter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: yawningotter

Polotics.


7 posted on 01/29/2014 9:22:24 PM PST by mylife (Ted Cruz understands the law, and he does not fear the unlawful.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: yawningotter

The same reason there will be a USS Obama some day.
Pure politics.


9 posted on 01/29/2014 9:25:37 PM PST by mylife (Ted Cruz understands the law, and he does not fear the unlawful.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: yawningotter

Some boat designs don’t make it.
Thresher and Scorpion were prime examples. Although considered Skipjack Class they were not like the others.
Many boats are experimental.
The Narwhal was a one off boat.


11 posted on 01/29/2014 9:38:01 PM PST by mylife (Ted Cruz understands the law, and he does not fear the unlawful.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: yawningotter

USS William H. Bates (SSN-680), a Sturgeon-class attack submarine, was planned to be the second U.S. Navy ship to be named USS Redfish — for the redfish, a variety of salmon also called blueback, sawqui, red salmon, and nerka — when the contract to build her was awarded to Ingalls Shipbuilding in Pascagoula, Mississippi, on 25 June 1968. However, upon the 22 June 1969 death of William H. Bates (1917–1969), the U.S. Representative from Massachusetts’s 6th Congressional District (1950–1969) known for his staunch support of nuclear propulsion in the U.S. Navy, she was renamed William H. Bates and was laid down on 4 August 1969 as the only ship of the U.S. Navy to have borne the name. The reason for her naming by then-Secretary of the Navy John Chafee, breaking with a long-standing Navy tradition of naming U.S. Navy attack submarines for sea creatures, was best summed up by Admiral Hyman Rickover, the then-director of the Navy’s nuclear reactors program, with the pithy comment that, “Fish don’t vote!”[1]


13 posted on 01/29/2014 9:52:24 PM PST by mylife (Ted Cruz understands the law, and he does not fear the unlawful.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: yawningotter
Amen to that brother.. USS Jimmy Carter SSN 23

I can sort of understand why the Navy did it...he's a Canoe U grad, and commanded a sub...

IIRC..the Navy first first messed up its naming policy with the USS Hyman G. Rickover. It's understandable why they wanted to honor him..but once you open the floodgates..

I'm really pissed about the Gerald Ford...no way he deserves that.

At least no Clinton or Obama..ever..

19 posted on 01/30/2014 1:14:58 AM PST by ken5050 (This space available cheap...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson