Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: palmer

I had a solar water heater for my pool. It worked very well. Solar has its uses but it sure isn’t going to replace power plants.


18 posted on 01/29/2014 5:47:59 PM PST by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: driftdiver

I have a solar heater on my pool here in Florida and it works absolutely great in the late spring and early fall. Maybe extends the swimming season a month overall, that however will never replace an actual heater using real power. It’s a joke to think it will.


20 posted on 01/29/2014 6:02:15 PM PST by WHBates
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: driftdiver
That worked because heating water can capture a lot more of the sun's energy (up to 70%). It's much better than electricity considering inefficient solar photovoltaic, losses feeding it back into the grid, sending it across lossy lines, then using it to drive a resistive load on the other end.

In that case imagine instead of capturing 70% of the sun's energy to heat your water we paid someone to capture 25% of the sun's energy, then convert it to A/C and feed it to the grid. We would pay them taxpayer funds to set up the system then pay them full retail for the electricity. By the time you got to use it for a heater you would get maybe 10% of the sun's energy at best but pay big bucks for that. But that is what we are subsidizing.

33 posted on 01/30/2014 2:34:51 AM PST by palmer (Obama = Carter + affirmative action)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson