Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Democrats are screaming bloody murder about this.

They KNOW it means huge numbers of average people, who donb't vote for a living, will turn out to vote against it, as has happened in every state that has been allowed to vote on it.

1 posted on 01/28/2014 2:42:09 PM PST by tcrlaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: tcrlaf

I wonder if this thread will be flooded by those who oppose this action.

Most gay marriage threads get taken over by them.


2 posted on 01/28/2014 2:45:03 PM PST by ansel12 (Ben Bradlee -- JFK told me that "he was all for people's solving their problems by abortion".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tcrlaf

Why, why, this is something the TALIBAN would do. Oh wait, the taliban would actually KILL the fagola.


3 posted on 01/28/2014 2:45:25 PM PST by Zuben Elgenubi (NOPe to GOPe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tcrlaf

Only to have some activist judge come along and knock it down.


4 posted on 01/28/2014 2:45:48 PM PST by Thorliveshere (Minnesota Survivor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tcrlaf

Congrats to Indiana! Voting for my state’s constitutional definition of marriage as between one man and one woman was one of the three votes in my life that I was most proud of casting. The other two being for Reagan in ‘88 and for Palin in ‘08.


5 posted on 01/28/2014 2:49:05 PM PST by greene66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tcrlaf
The longer this argument goes on, the less I care about it.

I was married for half my life and was miserable.

Anybody who wants to share that kind of misery is welcome to do so in my book.

6 posted on 01/28/2014 2:49:08 PM PST by elkfersupper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tcrlaf

What are the chances in the senate, and the guv’s desk?


7 posted on 01/28/2014 2:49:21 PM PST by umgud (2A can't survive dem majorities)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tcrlaf

I thought they already had an amendment.


8 posted on 01/28/2014 2:49:47 PM PST by darkangel82
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tcrlaf

Hooray, Indiana! Maybe you’ll lead the way for other states and start the return to sanity.

Of course, all this means is that homo “marriage” is ultimately destined to be decided by the Supreme Court.


10 posted on 01/28/2014 2:54:05 PM PST by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tcrlaf

YEA!


12 posted on 01/28/2014 2:57:35 PM PST by JSDude1 (Defeat Hagan, elect a Constutional Conservative: Dr. Greg Brannon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tcrlaf

The Judge Shopping Begins.


15 posted on 01/28/2014 3:28:03 PM PST by Oliviaforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tcrlaf

begs the question ... why did they not do this years ago?


17 posted on 01/28/2014 3:32:37 PM PST by campaignPete R-CT (Let the dead bury the dead. Let the GOP bury the GOP.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tcrlaf
They KNOW it means huge numbers of average people, who don't vote for a living, will turn out to vote against it, as has happened in every state that has been allowed to vote on it.

No, in 2012 voters in Minnesota rejected an amendment outlawing same-sex marriage.

18 posted on 01/28/2014 3:40:12 PM PST by ConstantSkeptic (Be careful about preconceptions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tcrlaf
while leaving the door open to eventual approval of civil unions.

"Civil unions" = "gay marriage" with a different label.

22 posted on 01/28/2014 3:50:09 PM PST by EternalVigilance (With God all things are possible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tcrlaf

If Wikipedia can be trusted (a big if), here is how Indiana’s House is divided:

69 Republicans, 31 Demon-Rats

The Indiana House is divided:
39 Republicans, 13 Demon-Rats (apparently 1 vacancy)


24 posted on 01/28/2014 4:15:22 PM PST by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tcrlaf

Would they also ban same sex marriages between people who are not “gay”?


25 posted on 01/28/2014 4:41:43 PM PST by Figment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tcrlaf

This is a defeat for those that fight for sanctity of marriage. Law had to be passed two years in a row without amendment. By passing an amended law, the cowards both left a door open for civil unions AND delayed the vote by another year making sure it does not go on the ballot in 2014. Dems and RINO’s doing what they always do.


27 posted on 01/28/2014 5:35:37 PM PST by BurningOak (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2830849/reply?c=1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tcrlaf
Indiana House approves constitutional amendment to ban gay marriages

Thank you...hope it passes...

35 posted on 01/28/2014 6:31:54 PM PST by ExCTCitizen (2014: The Year of DEAD RINOS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tcrlaf

FINALLY!!!! Go Indiana!!


39 posted on 01/29/2014 2:04:00 AM PST by Ann Archy (Abortion......the Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson