Now you assert "non-responsiveness and "irrelevance" with no argument or reasoning to back it up. So far, all you've done is send over assertions with no support.
Now you’re blithering.
You claim that the purpose of imprisonment is to protect society from the criminal, and that therefore killing the criminal is not acceptable.
You fail to address the fact that a dead ciminal will NEVER AGAIN offend agaisnt anyone.
Your argument fails the basic test of self consistency.
Perhaps you are content with that; I find it (your argument) ludicrous.