Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RKBA Democrat; ansel12

Back then there was no paternity or DNA testing and women had no real legal rights, so state sanctioned marriage was for the benefit of women and children. That is no longer needed legally - like it or not.


118 posted on 01/27/2014 11:09:14 PM PST by reaganaut (Ex-Mormon, now Christian. I once was lost but now am found, was blind but now I see.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]


To: reaganaut

Whatever you are trying to say, you are sure wrong about it.

The early federal laws dealing with marriage had absolutely nothing to do with paternity, zero.


129 posted on 01/27/2014 11:39:44 PM PST by ansel12 (Ben Bradlee -- JFK told me that "he was all for people's solving their problems by abortion".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson