[SoConPubbie]

What capitulation? Marriage isn’t mentioned in the U.S. Constitution.

That's right, it wasn't, either way.

Neither was abortion.

You skipped right over what I posted.

Do you think the Founders would approve?

Or do you think they didn't include Marriage as an issue with regards to Homosexuality and other perversions because they could not see a time where such perversions would be included in the definition of Marriage?

Do you think if they were alive today that they would have included provisions for protecting human life at all stages and strongly defined marriage?

Or are you a Libertarian who believes that morality has no place either in natural or constitutional law.

Do you think the founders thought that way?

[rockrr]

You know the saying: “The founders would be shooting by now”

My personal sense is that I am voiceless in the matter (especially since I live in a libtard-dominate state). So, since the matter is settled (at least as far as the libtards are concerned) my fallback position is to vex the left with their own poison.

So my stance is this: “Marriage” is the union of one man and one woman. If you change that equation it ain’t marriage any longer. If the state imposes its will on the matter then marriage means nothing and should be eliminated (as far as the state is concerned) or pried wide open to include multiple parties, barnyard animals, old rock albums, etc.

The only part of marriage that mattered (or should matter) was the church sanction. The government part only mattered when it was relevant. Since the libtard “won” it is now irrelevant.