Posted on 01/27/2014 2:10:22 PM PST by i88schwartz
RUTH MARCUS, WASHINGTON POST: I think it comes to something very interesting that ties together the Huckabee comments and the Rand Paul comments, which is there's only two ways -- there seem to me a tendency to talk about women in two ways when it comes to sex and sexual activity. Either they're terrible victims preyed on by older men as in Monica Lewinsky. President Clinton did a bad, bad thing, Monica Lewinsky was not precisely an innocent victim completely, I recall thong flashing there. They're either innocent victims or they are sexually promiscuous, slutty, low-life women. There's no sort of women get to use sex and sexual activity and with that use contraception responsibly just like men do.
(Excerpt) Read more at realclearpolitics.com ...
Many women have some kind of ability or competence. There’s no indication that Hillary Clinton does.
Exactly; do you think that it should be an impeachable offense if the First Lady is caught meddling in public affairs?
Interesting question. I’m more inclined to say, “Yes, it should be,” than “No,” but that’s assuming that “impeachable offense” means anything.
Thing is, that First Ladies have no business having an agenda that requires the President’s signature. Women in America have the ability to do their own thing without permission of a man and frankly Michelle’s lunch program antics have done nothing but damage. Why can’t First Ladies concentrate on fashion (like Jackie O. did) or being a good hostess or simply making life better for the President? Cripes, there are a lot of things a First Lady can do without meddling in politics.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.