There's a resolution before the Board of Supervisors. It's "Opposing Anti-Abortion Banners on Market Street."
Resolution opposing the anti-abortion banners on Market Street, urging the dedication of banner proceeds to the Department of Public Health for a campaign advancing accurate and scientifically verifiable education about women’s reproductive health, and requesting the review of banner regulations to assess whether the banners were issued in violation of City law.
It is sponsored by eight of the eleven supervisors.
Meanwhile, if some conservative city council overwhelmingly made a resolution "opposing...banners" of some pet leftist cause, you'd be seeing breathless extended coverage on your national network evening news, at least if you still watched such a thing.
They hang rainbow flags on all the public buildings in that city at the drop of a hat.
Sorry there, supervisors. The pro-life position is supported by science, the pro-abortion position is not. If you supervisors are honest about wanting women to receive accurate scientific information about their "reproductive health", will you support forcing abortionists to give prospective clients an overview of pregnancy with a focus on fetal development at the time of the abortion?
The nervous system begins to form at three weeks after conception. By five weeks, all organs are formed and the brain is acting as master controller. The fetus is aware--albeit not in the same manner as an adult, but it still senses and responds to its environment. This consciousness continues to become more refined as time goes by, until the brain reaches its mature state at about age 25 (that's years, not months).
There is no scientific basis for the hooey that is used to support abortion.