Posted on 01/25/2014 10:01:08 PM PST by smoothsailing
January 26, 2014
Ericynot1 wrote: So here's the deal. Despite Ransom's wishful thinking, barring some unforeseen event such as a serious illness in her family, Hillary will be the Dem candidate in 2016. And that should make you happy -- if she's as bad as you think she is, she ought to be easily defeated by the Republican candidate of your choice. Hillary Gets Knifed In Benghazi Drive By
Dear Comrade Ericynot,
Sounds like a deal with the devil.
You apparently have a reading comprehension problem.
That’s ok. It’s goes with your math problem, your women problems and the problems you have with basic shapes and colors.
And BEFORE you deny having women problems, knock it off.
You’re a liberal. You ALL have women problems.
Hillary, Pelosi, Wendy Davis, Sheila Jackson Lee, Maxine Waters…it’s a stunning line.
Now tell me seriously you don’t believe in Hell.
I did not say that Hillary won’t be nominee from the Democrat Party for president of the United States.
I said her candidacy is likely dead. I acknowledged that the New York Times won’t give it up.
And I’m sure that Hillary won’t either.
But given that she couldn’t beat Barack Obama prior to her disastrous term as Secretary of State, I’m not sure that that little resume item is going to help her bid to become the chief executive for the nation.
But you are right about this.
Democrats, unlike normal people, have a depth perception problem.
This may be related to your problem with basic shapes and colors.
Dems can’t see past the rather shallow, one-dimensional script put out for you by the mainstream media.
Obama got a pretty big assist by the media in defeating Hillary, as was even acknowledged by Saturday Night Live.
They nominated Obama, over Hillary, despite Obama’s lacking even the thin resume that Hillary had.
Yes, her most notable accomplishment has been being a cuckold to Bill for 39 years, many of which he served in public office—and that better qualifies her to be president than Obama. This has become very apparent to everyone over the last five years.
So Democrats may indeed make her party nominee for president. Her failures might be seen by Democrats in a positive light, just like they see Obama’s failures positively.
Back to Saturday Night Live: They did a spoof of the “Hillary 3AM” commercial in which Obama didn’t even know how to turn on the White House furnace.
He still doesn’t know how to do it...
More at link....
Maybe McCain or Grahamnesty will run with Hillary.
Or hey, how about Huckabee? He certainly stammered through that apology for insulting welfare queens so fast I thought his hair was going to curl, right there on feminist Megan’s show
Or hey, how about Huckabee? He certainly stammered through that apology for insulting welfare queens so fast I thought his hair was going to curl, right there on feminist Megan’s show
LOL.
He saw the tape of himself and asked his wife:
‘Did I really sound that stupid honey ?’
And her look back to him was unambiguous.
“Women’s Libitos“
“Uncle Sugar“
Eh, he should have stayed with it. He was on the right track, some reason he’s walking it back for running for pres.
He was on the right track, if you ask me. These dames should not be looking for a payout of any sort on BCP. animals. He’s a wimp
God I hope he is not.
No, whatever point he was trying to make he f.ed it up and should drop the subject altogether fast.
Just move on, he is just too dumb.
Guys like him and Tod Akin don't know how to point a gun in the right direction, so they need to stay away from them.
Sharp instruments in their hands are dangerous.
I would say that’s right. Yes He wasn’t wrong. Just so unstudied on the subject. Like mouthing off. Megan Kelly squashed him, yet she was wrong. These wimps. Ugh
I agree with you that us dames should not be looking for a payout but disagree with you that Huckabee was walking it back. He stood his ground.
Of course she squashed him.
Like her or not, Megan Kelly is smart and Huckbee is dumb.
She knows how to articulate her points,
He does not.
I am long past trying to explain what these bozos are trying to say, especially with topics like this.
Glad you think so. Maybe I was being too hard on him. He certainly was trying in some respects.
He was right
Uncle Sugar ???
Huck is dangerous to his own side.
He must of went to the Tod Akin school of articulation.
That’s right. These guys have to not be dumb. He’s way past prime of running for pres, yet that’s what’s being said. He has pouts but cannot stand up to lib pressure.
If they can’t make it on Fox News, they can just forget it.
I can guess what he was trying to get across and I could articulate it in a coherent way, unlike him, but its just not worth it.
He took an issue that could have been debated and screwed it up, yet again.
These guys are so tone deaf. They sort of just march around probably telling old stories and hoping things will get better. Meanwhile college grads, who are supposed to foot the bill for all of this, are ignored. They have a ridiculous labor participation rate, they have no health insurance, $20G debt (avg) and go from there. 25% of their paycheck goes to soc sec that will not go to them
They are not watching network news. The smart candidate knows these guys are on twitter, ondtagramand are texting. And he knows just how to tap into that without being a whiner about geo steppinalloverus or maddow
He has twenty five year olds on staff who hsve worked hard, are loyal and can tap into that group
Romney was on jimmy Fallon. He can forget it ditto huckabee, Christie, bush, and the rest of the reruns
None of that means she wouldn't win against either the anointed RINO or a conservative with a RINO blade in his shoulders.
FReegards,
CO
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.