Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Repent and Believe
do I as a non-religious not have religious freedom

A person need not be religious to observe that privileging contraceptives and sterilization over drugs and surgeries that actually treat illness or injury is simply absurd. Remember that insurers are not only required to provide these products and services: they are at no cost to the recipient. There may be a copayment on your antibiotics, or a deductible on your rotator-cuff repair surgery, but not on contraceptives or sterilization.

How much more obvious could it be that Darth Sibelius and Infanticide Obama simply want to eliminate people?

12 posted on 01/25/2014 4:11:21 AM PST by Tax-chick (Embracing my inner evil robot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Tax-chick

If the medical industry would quit acting atheistically or worse and pronounce the truth, such as: Pregnancy is the normal state of the uterus, (what else is it there for?), and, Chemical contraceptives are poisonous, class I carcinogens and do not provide health benefits to the user

http://gerardnadal.com/2012/02/15/world-health-organization-data-on-birth-control-pill-and-estrogen-replacement-carcinogenicity/

It is insane for anyone to take them, to allow a loved one to take them, and to not care enough to know that a person with whom they are intimate is taking them

Birth control of any sort pushes God out of the situation and, of course, invites the alternative

That’s a problem. The nuns will never have anything to do with that.


15 posted on 01/25/2014 4:37:47 AM PST by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson