Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GeronL

“the hospital and the Munoz family agreed on crucial facts listed in a court document: that Marlise Munoz, 33, has “met the clinical criteria for brain death since November 28” and that “the fetus gestating inside Mrs. Munoz is not viable.””

The case was brought by the hospital and many in Texas have said on more than one occasion that the hospital was abusing the law. I do not know if someone at the hospital has an agenda or not. Asking me why someone else files a suit doesn’t make sense I am not their lawyer (or a lawyer at all)

Perhaps someone is trying to establish some type of precedent. I don’t know


39 posted on 01/24/2014 8:17:00 PM PST by Nifster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]


To: Nifster

“not viable” because he/she too young is a FAR DIFFERENT thing than saying the baby is “not alive”

A FAR FAR DIFFERENT THING


40 posted on 01/24/2014 8:20:59 PM PST by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson