Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mommyq
Didn’t Australia rescue a 16 year old girl who was sailing around the world alone? Now we want to be reimbursed for our rescue?

She was actually picked up by the French, although Australia was heavily involved in the rescue effort (the girl got herself in trouble on the border of Australian and French maritime rescue zones - Australia had better aerial resources to precisely locate her, but a French vessel was close enough to pick her up. But the situation is different.

Her life was in danger, making her a 'distressed mariner' and therefore the response to rescue her fell under the general 'law of the sea' - that mariners and maritime nations respond to rescue each other because you'd expect the others to do it for you.

In the case of the MV Akademik Shokalskiy, they weren't actually in any real immediate danger. They could have stayed icebound for quite a while quite safely, waiting for the opportunity to leave. That changes things - there's a difference between mobilising resources to save people who are in actual danger, and doing it simply because they are in an uncomfortable situation.

20 posted on 01/25/2014 12:28:10 AM PST by naturalman1975 ("America was under attack. Australia was immediately there to help." - John Winston Howard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: naturalman1975

Thanks for the info.


21 posted on 02/05/2014 9:32:09 PM PST by mommyq
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson