Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: McBuff

“Family law” has been anti-family law for a long time. It was turned solidly against fatherhood during the ‘80s and ‘90s. It’s a cash cow for “professionals” and just another way to prevent domestic competition (working class families) from rising. It’s much of the cause of the economic decline.


6 posted on 01/23/2014 3:52:44 PM PST by familyop (We Baby Boomers are croaking in an avalanche of corruption smelled around the planet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: familyop
This is the interesting part:

"A filing Wednesday by the DCF argues the sperm donor contract overlooks ‘‘the well-established law in this state that a person cannot contract away his or her obligations to support their child.’’ The right for support belongs to the child, not the parents, the filing says."

Here's the problem, the redefinition of marriage has removed the term "Father" and "Mother." It is now simply "Partner 1" and "Partner 2." The redefining of marriage has removed the right of children to be raised and/or supported by a Father and Mother. It's a train wreck.

10 posted on 01/23/2014 4:05:21 PM PST by McBuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson