You seem a bit sensitive about this.
You’re all jacked up over your confusion about this 22 month vs 3 year old thing, which may be one of the least significant details of the entire story. It has exactly zero bearing on what transpired that day, unless you think the guy was shot for lying about the age of his daughter.
I apologize for pointing out that your ‘quote’ was not a quote at all, but an eyewitness report. YOu do get that there is a difference, right?
"Reeves and his wife were sitting behind Oulson and his wife. Oulson told Reeves that he was texting with his 3-year-old daughter," Cummings said.
If you feel this is one of the least significant details of the entire story, why do you also feel the need to persistently dispute the discrepancy?