[Lion Den Dan]

There are plenty of self righteous jerks on this forum and elsewhere who will shout for Reeves’ blood and whine about the dead guy being shot for no reason. However, had the deceased not been anoying Reeves and had not thrown popcorn in his face, he would not be dead.
It is for a jury to decide the facts, of which we are not in posession, regarding the guilt or innocence of the shooter. The crap this woman is pulling is self serving and poisonous.

[kjam22]

For all Carry and Conceal people.. (that includes me).... it’s against the law to shoot and kill someone in a movie theater because they ignored your demands they quit texting. Even if they throw popcorn on you.

[Lazamataz]

There are plenty of self righteous jerks on this forum and elsewhere who will shout for Reeves’ blood and whine about the dead guy being shot for no reason. However, had the deceased not been anoying Reeves and had not thrown popcorn in his face, he would not be dead.

Right, because the right to kill people who mildly annoy you is right there in the Bill of Rights.

Shooter Dude went to theater management. After that, you wait until the offender is ejected, watching from the aisle with great satisfaction.

Then as a bonus, you demand free tickets to the movie of your choice because 'this one was RUNED'.

You get to experience shadenfreude as the texting jerk is tossed. You get free tickets. You still watch the movie. And, most importantly, you do not spend the rest of your life in jail because you couldn't control your anger.

[DoodleDawg]

However, had the deceased not been anoying Reeves and had not thrown popcorn in his face, he would not be dead.

So if you annoy me I can shoot you?

[dmz]

However, had the deceased not been anoying Reeves

<><<><><><

Yes, because as we all know, annoying people is a capital offense.

The jury is out, but you might be one of those self righteous types you were talking about.