You're the one defending him against that mean 'ole widow woman.
I guess you also think there’s no “statistical probability” an officer of the U.S. military of Muslim faith and Arabic ethnicity would execute dozens of his unarmed U.S. military colleagues in a jihadist action on a U.S. military base, do you?????
And what does that have to do with the victim in this case?
I could tell you what I really think of your thought processes. But it would probably get me flagged.
And you've displayed what passes for your thought process enough already.
You are incredibly dishonest. You have argued that the victim’s military service essentially ruled against him being a hothead, and that it was a statistical improbability that anyone coming out of the military could be unstable. That is an untenable argument. I countered your statement by reminding you of Mr. Nidal Hassam, an Arabic Islamic U.S. military officer who fired upon and executed many unarmed troops at a U.S. military base in a fit of jihadist rage. In your next post defending against my comments further, you very conveniently FORGOT that you had argued this point against me in your earlier post. And then you have the gall to pretend not to know what the attack I mentioned has to do with the theater shooting? It has to do with your comments! It is proof that your premise about ex military people being essentially stable and not hot heads is bunk and garbage, that’s what it has to do with!