[RC one]

yes, because we have a nation full of alcoholics, we should encourage drug addiction. Brilliant. Oh, and there's no difference between drinking a couple of beers and taking a couple of bong hits of white widow. No difference at all. right? I have been dealing with drug addicts and alcoholics for decades. I am too familiar with their M.O. Everything they say and do revolves around justifying their addiction. It gets to the point where you aren't even talking to a person anymore, you're talking to a disease process, to a slave. And this is what you and Obama want for America? For yourself? what a waste of a life.

Face it. Someone has to be the grown up here.

[tacticalogic]

I have been dealing with drug addicts and alcoholics for decades.

I understand if you think that experience makes you better qualified to talk about what public policy should be with regard to drugs. I think Sara Brady believes the same thing with regard to guns, and I have to discount her opinion because she's emotionally attached to the issue and can't be trusted to be objective because of it.

[William Tell]

RC one said: "yes, because we have a nation full of alcoholics, we should encourage drug addiction. "

Oh, how I yearn for the good old days; when permitting something to free adults did not constitute approval or encouragement.

What other things of which you disapprove would you like to outlaw?

[dennisw]

agree with you a 100%. Pot is for losers and pot legalization is for nations that want to be loser nations. South Korea is booming and you never here about pot legalization there or in any other booming Asian nation such as Taiwan and Japan, China

The worlds gold and wealth is moving from West to East and one factor is pot usage, other drugs usage and now pot legalization in the US and the West