I believe the truth of hard evidence and all hard evidence points to weather stations placed so as to increase the temps that they record, data massaged for the same end (hockey stick East Anglia) and peer reviewed data that is based on all falsified data. You are free to believe whatever you want to believe but even the head climatologist from MIT is calling out these criminal con men.
Thank you for bestowing my freedoms on me.
If you read my postings here, you might find that I am, for the most part, in agreement with you - uo to the point where you called John Stossel a liar.