I don’t know if it’s TRUE, but it’s what several Dem congressmen & State employees have said in response to GOP remarks about the recent Benghazi “report.” And it has been reported on Fox. (Therefore, several talking heads have claimed it’s all Stevens’ fault.)
Stevens was said to have “refused” additional “military” security; purportedly, he wanted “State Deptartment security.” Anyone know what that is?
To my knowledge, Stevens’ purported preference for the nonmilitary assets wasn’t made public until last week.
Stevens had turned muslim from what I read. He trusted these goons waaay too much as became all to obvious.
No one can dispute that the British and French presecnes in Benghai had been atacked along with so many other “infidel occupied” buildings. It was obvious to anyone who looked at the situation that the annex and and our version of an embassy was next. You had to be a fool to trust the locals and not put Marines or the equivalent at the embassy for security.