Selective Nanny State PING!
It’s funny that you say that. I just read an article about marijuana use - not that I am interested at all. The study surprised the administrators with the remarkable low instances of lung cancer for pot smokers. Especially since they inhale and keep the smoke in their lungs for a longer period of time. Is there a remote possibility, that if you are going to smoke something, then it should be pot over tobacco? You have to admit that the only reason that tobacco is still legal is because they tax the sh!t out of it. None of us would want to see what would happen to our income taxes if they got rid of tobacco taxes. Personally I don’t give a rip it they legalize pot and put a 100% tax on it. It is a sin tax and doesn’t affect me at all. In the same breath of air, I would require anyone purchasing pot to sign a waiver of liability that would prevent the govt or any insurance company from treating them for cancer if and when the smoker comes down with it.
Although I could into pages upon pages to dispute everything and refute much of it - I will save everyone the tedium and just use two words - BOVINE EXCREMENT
Thanks for the ping!