Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

‘We Still Stand by What We Believe’: Bakers Who Refused to Make a Gay Wedding Cake Double Down
The Blaze ^ | January 20, 2014 | Billy Hallowell

Posted on 01/20/2014 10:45:45 PM PST by yoe

Officials in Oregon have ruled that Sweet Cakes by Melissa, a bakery that made national news after refusing to make a cake for a gay wedding last year, violated a lesbian couple’s civil rights.

Owners Aaron and Melissa Klein, Christians who oppose same-sex unions, reacted to the Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries’ ruling in an interview with KATU-TV, telling the outlet that they stand by their convictions.

“We still stand by what we believe from the beginning,” ( said Aaron Klein). “I’m not sure what future holds, but as far as where we’re at right now … it’s almost as if the state is hostile toward Christian businesses.”

(Excerpt) Read more at theblaze.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Extended News
KEYWORDS: homosexualagenda; melissaklein; sweetcakes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-103 next last
Oregon is still in America isn't it??????


1 posted on 01/20/2014 10:45:45 PM PST by yoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: yoe

Almost???


2 posted on 01/20/2014 10:51:09 PM PST by informavoracious (Open your eyes, people!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #3 Removed by Moderator

To: yoe
Apparently the couple wasn't opposed to making them birthday cakes but not a wedding cake. Which shows that there motivation was about violating their religion and not against the homosexuals themselves.

But I agree that this is a form of harassment by the state for even considering taking this on.

4 posted on 01/20/2014 10:58:41 PM PST by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yoe
Apparently the couple wasn't opposed to making them birthday cakes but not a wedding cake. Which shows that there motivation was about violating their religion and not against the homosexuals themselves.

But I agree that this is a form of harassment by the state for even considering taking this on.

5 posted on 01/20/2014 10:58:41 PM PST by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: caww

Our governments have to grow up and start telling hysterical gays to get a real life of their own.


6 posted on 01/20/2014 11:00:39 PM PST by CorporateStepsister (I am NOT going to force a man to make my dreams come true)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: yoe

The Gaystapo will ruthless purge any dissent to the approved ideology.


7 posted on 01/20/2014 11:08:29 PM PST by Ronin (Dumb, dependent and Democrat is no way to go through life - Rep. L. Gohmert, Tex)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: informavoracious

I think they should appeal based on the argument that it’s not their choice.

That they have a right to be Christian, in their denomination.

And that their denomination teaches that homosexual marriage goes against the will of God.

Therefore, in order to practice their religion, they cannot support homosexual religion.

In other words, make the Court address the application of religion - that’s what the issue is.

Application is everything - the Court already acknowledges that there are exemptions for churches and religious schools. That means there are exemptions where the act cannot be separated from the religious belief.

That’s what needs to be argued - that business dos not separate a person from their religious belief.

And here, I’ll prove it - if this was a Muslim bakery, that’s exactly what would be argued.

And it would win.


8 posted on 01/20/2014 11:09:23 PM PST by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: yoe

Unfortunately, that very American sign that you have posted is trumped by all the anti-discrimination laws passed by a meddling federal government and even the state governments.

With these laws, private businesses no longer have the right to refuse service to certain groups of people based on religion, ethnicity, race and even sexual deviancy.

There is no more freedom.


9 posted on 01/20/2014 11:14:41 PM PST by Oliviaforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yoe

I’m sorry, but you’re wrong. When you decide to become a “fee for service” business - you have to take on all comers.

Black Letter law, affirmed by SCOTUS - goes back to Civil Rights days ...

They either have to suck it up - or close their business.

No different than if they wanted to refuse service to a person based on their politics ...


10 posted on 01/20/2014 11:16:09 PM PST by Lmo56 (If ya wanna run with the big dawgs - ya gotta learn to piss in the tall grass ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yoe

Didn’t the couple violate the civil rights of the couple who owns the bakery?


11 posted on 01/20/2014 11:29:08 PM PST by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lmo56
I’m sorry, but you’re wrong. When you decide to become a “fee for service” business - you have to take on all comers.

Black Letter law, affirmed by SCOTUS - goes back to Civil Rights days ...

It may be law, but it sure isn't right.

12 posted on 01/20/2014 11:32:37 PM PST by Washi (Stop Obama's War On Jobs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: yoe

Lol

Boy howdy with a name like Aaron Klein....I woulda never guessed they were anything but of the tribe....

But God bless them....they have mettle

Hope they fare better than Maurice of BBQ fame...

Standing up to PC fascism


13 posted on 01/20/2014 11:34:29 PM PST by wardaddy (wifey instructed me today to grow chapter president beard back again....i wonder why?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lmo56

I wonder what the SCOTUS thinks about a governor saying certain people aren’t welcome in a state?


14 posted on 01/20/2014 11:34:51 PM PST by Irenic (The pencil sharpener and Elmer's glue is put away-- we've lost the red wheelbarrow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: max americana
"Why didn’t they just lace the cake with ex lax and get it over with?"

Actually, I would be worried that this couple would lace the cake themselves and blame it on the baker.

15 posted on 01/20/2014 11:43:56 PM PST by CatOwner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Lmo56
I’m sorry, but you’re wrong. When you decide to become a “fee for service” business - you have to take on all comers. Black Letter law, affirmed by SCOTUS - goes back to Civil Rights days ... They either have to suck it up - or close their business.

It's a bad law, just like Roe, Dred Scott, and Plessy, and no decent person should accept bad law as settled law.

16 posted on 01/20/2014 11:47:17 PM PST by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: yoe

Will the gay “marriage” supporting Republicans support Religious freedom????

This ruling is unConstitutional see the 1st amendmendment.


17 posted on 01/20/2014 11:54:49 PM PST by RginTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pollster1

I set the fee. I decide the service. I am not a slave who can be required to do what I choose not to do.


18 posted on 01/21/2014 12:00:52 AM PST by Louis Foxwell (This is a wake up call. Join the Sultan Knish ping list.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: yoe; Ohioan; Pelham; nathanbedford; Travis McGee; CatherineofAragon

This is King day

I survived yet another of this superfluous assigned day of so called conservatives from Rush to Beck to Levin to Hannity making fools of themselves and being ignorant...
Willfully ignorant.
Those acts...CRA etc
Lauded by so many fools here

Made this happen..

Cause and effect.

Yet public rightists can’t claim KING and credit quick enough

Even Allen West....does anyone this side of the White Doe have any public balls over this


19 posted on 01/21/2014 12:04:46 AM PST by wardaddy (wifey instructed me today to grow chapter president beard back again....i wonder why?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lmo56

>> When you decide to become a “fee for service” business - you have to take on all comers

And does that include forcing the business to create and sell products he normally wouldn’t make?


20 posted on 01/21/2014 12:12:52 AM PST by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-103 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson