Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BenLurkin

It’s stuff like MICRA (which was signed into law by Jerry Brown, btw) that make me of two minds when it comes to medical tort reform.

I have no problem with reducing the incentive for frivolous and excessive lawsuits as a means to ease malpractice insurance costs. But I also know there are genuine cases of gross malpractice - surgeons who amputate the wrong leg, etc. I’m not so sure these bad docs and hospitals ought to be able to hide behind some cap to limit their liability.

At any rate, RIP to this young girl, and prayers up for the family.


11 posted on 01/16/2014 10:38:33 AM PST by DemforBush (Ice cream, Mandrake? Children's ice cream?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: DemforBush

Concur. Limit the payout to the layers, but don’t cap the actual payout to those type of cases (IE: wrong let/etc.)

In this case, IMHO, there appears to be plenty of blame to go around (family doctor seen?)


22 posted on 01/16/2014 11:30:54 AM PST by i_robot73 (Give me one example and I will show where gov't is the root of the problem(s).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: DemforBush

Problem is, greedy plaintiff lawyers are shameless in their demands for “care, comfort and society” awards.

The MICRA caps are a good thing — and a similar cap is needed for all wrongful death actions.


29 posted on 01/16/2014 11:51:20 AM PST by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson