Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Phillyred

the issue is this: women want to be able to make good money too and combat positions get combat pay


5 posted on 01/15/2014 6:42:28 AM PST by yldstrk (My heroes have always been cowboys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: yldstrk

“Combat pay” and the resulting promotion potential is not the issue, so much as the objective is to dilute down and destroy the effectiveness of our armed forces.

There is no glamour in the trenches, it is a grinding, relentless drain on the sensibilities and capabilities, which tends to dehumanize the individuals that are exposed for an overly long period.

This extended social experimentation in trying to reverse the traditional roles of the genders, while an interesting study in perverse incentives and inappropriate rewards, is doomed to failure in actual practice.


13 posted on 01/15/2014 6:57:13 AM PST by alloysteel (Those who deny natural climate change are forever doomed to stupidity. AGW is a LIE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: yldstrk

No. Some woman officers think they want to be in the combat arms so they can get on a faster track for promotions and command. They don’t actually have any idea what combat really is: killing people and sending your young people out where they will be killed or maimed.

Enlisted women want nothing to with combat and they are non-volunteering in droves.

Only dimwit careerists, worthless senior officers and brain-dead, non-serving congressturds and certainly the enemy want women in combat.


41 posted on 01/15/2014 3:06:34 PM PST by Chainmail (A simple rule of life: if you can be blamed, you're responsible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson