Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Anton.Rutter

“If you remember back to the Trayvon Martin case, the defense didn’t go forward with Stand Your Ground because the burden of proof was on them to show it was reasonable,” Dekle said. In the Zimmerman trial, he claimed self defense and did not invoke the stand your ground law.

That is a complete crock of $hit. Stand your ground was never a issue in that case. Zimmerman was pinned to the ground. It was clear Self Defense. Do these law professors even undersrand simple law.


37 posted on 01/15/2014 5:48:14 AM PST by DeWalt (Times are more like they used to be than they are today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: DeWalt
Do these law professors even undersrand simple law.

There exists a liberal academic bias.

Stalinists lie. ALWAYS.

Even if the law professors are aware of the genuine facts in the Zimmerman case, they serve to push an agenda to repeal such laws (and disarm the general populace). Creating confusion among the public by deliberate distortion of facts serves that end.

117 posted on 01/15/2014 6:29:30 AM PST by a fool in paradise ("Health care is too important to be left to the government.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson