Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: KTM rider
Who would be hurt more by charging for YouTube - YouTube, the person who posts the video or the person who wants to watch?

I can live without watching YouTube. But what about the YouTube investors?

8 posted on 01/14/2014 11:43:51 PM PST by Cowboy Bob (They are called "Liberals" because the word "parasite" was already taken.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Cowboy Bob

Total hot air out of that “article”. Youtube gets a heck of a living from advertisers and doesn’t need to charge for viewing any videos. Net neutrality is all about giving the FCC more power.


9 posted on 01/14/2014 11:46:27 PM PST by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Cowboy Bob

Charging a premium for video providers would hurt youtube(google), but they have deep pockets and would figure it out. But if you and I decided we were sick of YouTube, and wanted to start Freerepublicvideos.com, and found out Comcast wouldn’t let their customers view our content, or only allowed enough bandwidth that we could stream low res videos unless we pay them, it might put us out of business before we started.


12 posted on 01/14/2014 11:58:44 PM PST by Wayne07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson