[Pollster1]

He is socialist, communist, and fascist—and by the strict 20th century definitions, he is none of them.

The differences between national socialism, soviet socialism, fascism, and Obama's modern socialism are trivial - packaging, not substance. The bottom line is socialism, with absolute government power over what individuals do with their lives and over how their productivity is distributed. I prefer the freedom that comes with a small government. Slavery has never made people happy, and socialism is effectively slavery.

[Bryanw92]

>>The differences between national socialism, soviet socialism, fascism, and Obama’s modern socialism are trivial - packaging, not substance.

My point to the OP was that trying to define Obamunism is like trying to tie a string on a cloud and trying to define it in 20th century terms is a waste of time because the Progs will always be able to say, “No it isn’t THAT because of THIS.”